There is a very specific tone I used to have when sending invoices.
It was somewhere between polite and apologetic.
“Hi… just attaching the invoice… no rush… completely understand if you need anything clarified…”
As if I’d accidentally inconvenienced someone by completing the work we agreed on.
I would re-read invoices like they were fragile letters.
Checking the wording.
Softening the tone.
Almost expecting pushback before it even happened.
Pricing discomfort is not about numbers.
It’s about identity.
And when you’ve known what it feels like to have nothing, money becomes morally complicated.
There was a time in my life where financial instability wasn’t theoretical.
It was real.
Practical.
Immediate.
You measure differently when you’ve counted coins carefully.
You assess value differently when you’ve relied on help.
So when I started building a career — weddings, exhibitions, long-term documentary projects — the question of pricing wasn’t just business.
It was emotional.
How do you charge properly when you remember seasons of scarcity?
How do you ask for substantial fees when you know what it feels like to struggle?
There’s an internal conflict there.
One voice says:
You’ve worked hard. You’re skilled. Charge appropriately.
Another says:
Who are you to ask that much?
And beneath that second voice is something quieter:
What if you become the kind of person you once couldn’t afford?
That’s not logical.
But it’s real.
When money has once felt like a barrier, earning it in larger amounts can feel morally suspicious.
There were early meetings where I’d quote a number and feel my chest tighten slightly.
Even if it was fair.
Even if it reflected the time, skill, and responsibility involved.
It felt like I was asking for too much.
And “too much” wasn’t defined by the market.
It was defined by memory.
Memory of instability.
Memory of relying on support.
Memory of not having margin.
So I underpriced.
Not dramatically.
Just enough to feel safer.
Just enough to avoid the discomfort of saying a higher number confidently.
I told myself it was strategic.
Building portfolio.
Growing client base.
Staying competitive.
Some of that was true.
But underneath it was fear.
Fear that charging properly would expose me.
Fear that someone would say, “You’re not worth that.”
And if you’ve spent years rebuilding your identity, that sentence feels heavy.
There’s also guilt involved.
When you care about social impact work, when you’ve built projects around lived experience and community collaboration, charging can feel transactional in a space that feels relational.
You don’t want to commodify meaning.
You don’t want to appear driven by profit.
But sustainability requires structure.
There was a moment that shifted things for me.
I was working on a long-term collaborative awareness campaign.
Significant hours.
Travel.
Editing.
Planning.
Conversations that required emotional presence.
And at the end of it, when calculating the invoice, I hesitated.
The number reflected reality.
But my instinct was to reduce it.
To soften it.
To make it more comfortable.
Then I paused.
And asked myself a different question.
If I undercharge now, what happens next time?
If I discount sustainability, can I keep doing this work long term?
That’s the shift.
Sustainability enables service.
If I burn out financially, the projects stop.
If I undervalue my time consistently, the work shrinks.
If I treat my own labour as negotiable, the impact becomes limited.
Charging what you’re worth isn’t about ego.
It’s about longevity.
The comedy edge of this chapter is painfully familiar.
I have genuinely structured invoices like apology letters.
Adding extra explanation.
Padding with politeness.
Over-clarifying.
As if the number needed emotional cushioning.
I’d press send and immediately question it.
Was that too high?
Should I have adjusted?
Did that sound confident enough?
Money triggers something deep when your history includes scarcity.
It surfaces identity.
Are you still the person who struggled?
Are you allowed to earn well?
Are you betraying something by charging properly?
That’s the emotional core.
Conflict between past and present.
The past says:
Remember what it felt like not to have enough.
The present says:
Remember what it takes to maintain what you’ve built.
Reconciling those isn’t instant.
It’s gradual.
I had to redefine what charging meant.
It wasn’t extracting.
It wasn’t taking advantage.
It was structuring value.
When someone hires me for a wedding, they’re not just paying for a day.
They’re paying for years of refinement.
For instinct developed through repetition.
For judgement sharpened through experience.
For responsibility handled well under pressure.
That’s not arrogance.
It’s acknowledgment.
The same applies to social impact work.
Documentary projects are not casual tasks.
They require sensitivity, planning, editing, follow-up.
They carry emotional weight.
To underprice that is not humility.
It’s unsustainable.
There’s another uncomfortable layer.
When you’ve rebuilt your life, success can feel provisional.
As if it’s on loan.
So you hesitate to price confidently, because confident pricing feels like claiming permanence.
What if it disappears?
Better to keep things modest.
But modesty can quietly undermine growth.
There was a turning point where I decided to set rates aligned with the value delivered.
Not inflated.
Not apologetic.
Accurate.
The first few times I quoted those numbers, it felt bold.
Almost exposed.
But something interesting happened.
The right clients didn’t flinch.
They engaged.
Because confidence signals clarity.
If you don’t believe in the value of your work, others hesitate too.
Charging appropriately also filters.
It aligns expectations.
It creates structure.
And structure is not the enemy of impact.
It’s the foundation.
I had to confront guilt directly.
Earning well does not erase empathy.
Financial stability does not betray your past.
It honours it.
It means you are not living in survival mode anymore.
And that matters.
Because when you’re not in survival mode, you can serve more effectively.
You can offer pro bono work intentionally, not desperately.
You can invest in long-term projects without fear.
You can give strategically.
Undercharging from discomfort is not generosity.
It’s self-protection.
There’s a difference.
Generosity is intentional.
Underpricing from fear is reactive.
Now, when I write an invoice, it’s simpler.
Clear.
Direct.
Professional.
No apology.
Because the work has been done.
The value has been delivered.
The agreement was mutual.
And sustainability enables service.
That sentence anchors me.
If I want to keep telling stories.
If I want to keep building exhibitions.
If I want to keep collaborating with communities.
I must maintain financial stability.
That doesn’t make the work less meaningful.
It makes it possible.
There’s still a flicker sometimes when I quote larger projects.
A brief memory of earlier seasons.
But it no longer dictates the number.
It simply reminds me how far I’ve come.
Charging what you’re worth isn’t about asserting superiority.
It’s about respecting time, skill, and responsibility.
It’s about building a career that lasts.
And lasting matters more than undercutting yourself for temporary comfort.
I no longer write invoices like apology letters.
I write them like agreements fulfilled.
Because that’s what they are.
And that shift — quiet, practical, steady — has changed more than just numbers.
It’s changed posture.
From hesitant to grounded.
From apologetic to sustainable.
And sustainability is what allows the work to continue.
For years.
Not just seasons.
How to find this article: